| View table of contents | Drug Misuse Statistics Scotland 1999 |
Information on current and past injecting behaviour is reported to the Database. Details for 1998/99 are shown in Table 23 (and 45) and the trend over the period 1992/93 to 1998/99 is shown in Table 24. A summary of the trends in injecting behaviour is presented in Chart 16 (all ages) and Chart 17 (by age group) below.
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
The Database also seeks to provide an indication of the age when the individual first started injecting drugs (Tables 25 and 46). This information is based on the recollection of the patients/clients who in many cases may have been using and injecting drugs for several years; it is not possible to ascertain how accurate the individual responses might be.
|
![]() |
As noted earlier, heroin is frequently reported as the main drug being used. One of the features about misuse of this drug is the variety of routes of consumption of the drug. Table 26 presents details on the routes of consumption based on reports to the Database. Injecting and smoking the drug are the two routes most commonly reported and a summary by age group is presented in Chart 19 below.
|
![]() |
The risks to health through the spread of major infectious disease where people share injecting equipment are well documented (see Chapter 8). The presentation of drug users at services provides an opportunity to gain an insight into current practices among a section of injecting drug users, and provides systematically collected information for monitoring trends. Agency staff are asked to report to the Database details on the patient’s/client’s current and past sharing behaviour. It is believed that in some cases patients/clients may be reticent when asked to reveal that they share equipment and for this reason the percentage shown is likely to be an underestimate of the true picture.
It should be noted that as part of a revision of the data collection forms introduced in April 1995, changes were made to the sharing questions in order to improve the veracity of the responses. It is thought that this change explains most or all of the rise between 1994/95 and 1995/96 in the proportions reporting sharing of injecting equipment in the previous month. Complete information was received in 1998/99 from 3135 of the 3863 patients/ clients who said they had injected in the previous month (Tables 27, 28 and 47).
|
![]() |
|
For
a printable version of this section please download the PDF file
Right-click link and choose "Save Target As" or "Save Link As" |
||